Dear Werin,

Allow me to be brief, but I think you are currently wasting my time and my ink. To your slew of question, I say we have no use for hypothesis, since the facts are that occultists and other heretics can readily converse with those neutral beings you wish to classify as innocents. Your hypothesis thus need not be treated as a valid opposition.

As for my statement against the use of Occultism, I do believe I have used reason and logic in my argument over a zealous dogmatic approach. Indeed, if people were to follow my logic, they would come to terms with themselves and change their ways for the greater Good. However, as you have stated and proven yourself in your final comment, many are impervious to arguments that do not flatter their personal choice, and this laxity of mind leads them to shrug off a decent explanation in favour of personal leaps of faith into the precipice of error.

I will argue no more on this matter unless you raise a valid point devoid of smokey hypothesis, Ovate,

Forever Their witness
Siduri Azagnanna

Penned by my hand on the 22nd of Scarlatan, in the year 644 AF.